(Download) "Haunting the Buddha. Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism." by The Journal of the American Oriental Society * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Haunting the Buddha. Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism.
- Author : The Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Release Date : January 01, 2007
- Genre: Social Science,Books,Nonfiction,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 193 KB
Description
Haunting the Buddha. Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism. By ROBERT DECAROLI. New York: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2004. Pp. viii + 230, plates. Over thirty-five years ago, the great historian of Indian art. V. S. Agrawala, wrote a book on Ancient Indian Folk Cults. His stature resulted from his recognition that early Indian art needs to be analyzed as a pan-Indic phenomenon, and therefore it needs to be grounded in pan-Indic culture. He knew that culture intimately. Perhaps his book on folk cults was to have been the basis for a study on ancient Indian folk art, but that book was never written--by him or anyone else. Now Robert DeCaroli has produced a work that shows us just how difficult it is to write on this subject. DeCaroli concentrates on a segment of the subject: the relationship of early Buddhism to cultic beliefs in spirits and their representation in ancient Buddhist art. His investigation uses an all-inclusive term "spirit-deities" for beings such as yaksas, nagas, guhyakas, bhutas, pretas, gandharvas, pitrs, kumbhandas, pisacas, vrksadevatas (rukkhadevatas), vetalas, mahoragas, devaputras, vidyadharas, kimpurusas. apsarases, raksasas, kinnaras, assamukhis, and asuras (p. 10). It is apparent that DeCaroli's term describes a very diverse group of deities arising from Vedism and Brahmanism, from folk cults, from Indian realms inhabited by demonic and heavenly creatures, as well as from the sphere of divine kingship. Though none of these beings is limited to the Buddhist religious domain, it is through these that DeCaroli aims "to provide a comprehensive overview of the samgha's early relationship with spirit religions and develop a more complete understanding of a process of interaction that existed between these two systems [i.e., the samgha and spirit cults] over the course of centuries" (p.37). His main question is "Why did the Buddhist monastic community [i.e., the samgha] incorporate and maintain workship of spirits within its fold?" The answers, built up via selections of Buddhist stories, resemble anecdotal evidence in part because they are not sufficiently connected to the broad cultural base whence these deities entered Buddhism.